Particularly in SOC. They see all men as abusers and all women as victims.
Why r women in academia trapped in a self-victimizing feminist ideology?
-
No one is more harsh on women than other women. Consistently women police the behavior of other women more so than do men. For example, does anyone think it's really males who are discouraging females from promiscuous sekxs? Sulut shaming is not the invention of male oppression that the femenaszis would have you believe.
-
Women are certainly cruel and vicious, no doubt. But there are plenty of pompous / righteous men in the broad amorphous MGTOW 'movement' who are revolted by promiscuous women who sleep with a lot of men or who have children out of wedlock.
No one is more harsh on women than other women. Consistently women police the behavior of other women more so than do men. For example, does anyone think it's really males who are discouraging females from promiscuous sekxs? Sulut shaming is not the invention of male oppression that the femenaszis would have you believe.
-
Women are certainly cruel and vicious, no doubt. But there are plenty of pompous / righteous men in the broad amorphous MGTOW 'movement' who are revolted by promiscuous women who sleep with a lot of men or who have children out of wedlock.
Not me. If it weren’t for sl0/0ty women, I wouldn’t be able to be such a sl0/0ty man.
-
Women are certainly cruel and vicious, no doubt. But there are plenty of pompous / righteous men in the broad amorphous MGTOW 'movement' who are revolted by promiscuous women who sleep with a lot of men or who have children out of wedlock.
This doesn't negate the point the post you are responding to made though. I agree with the point that person was making. The role of male oppression in regulating female behavior is often oversold while the role of females themselves is drastically downplayed, written off as internalized oppression, completely ignored, etc. It's strange and, frankly, a type of gender discrimination - denying the agency of females/women.
-
Because women love men and men love women but we can't admit it anymore. It's the school dance all over again.
To the woman he said, "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."
-
I am a man advised by a woman. God! I am amazed how many reasons for conflict and tension she can find about me. Then, I do not coddle her for her drama. She gets further frustrated. “Look, you started P/M/Sing not me. Solve it yourself.” The amount of past men’s wrongs to her projected on me is crazy. I am just here to finish my degree, woman.
This doesn't negate the point the post you are responding to made though. I agree with the point that person was making. The role of male oppression in regulating female behavior is often oversold while the role of females themselves is drastically downplayed, written off as internalized oppression, completely ignored, etc. It's strange and, frankly, a type of gender discrimination - denying the agency of females/women.
-
Because women love men and men love women but we can't admit it anymore. It's the school dance all over again.
To the woman he said, "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."You love to see it.
-
The role of male oppression in regulating female behavior is often oversold while the role of females themselves is drastically downplayed, written off as internalized oppression, completely ignored, etc. It's strange and, frankly, a type of gender discrimination - denying the agency of females/women.
This is so true. There is a lot of mating behavior research, a good bit from sociologists even, that comes to similar conclusions. A lot of what is depicted as oppression from males is more accurately attributable to women po licing other women. $1ut shaymeng is a glaring example of this.
-
Particularly in SOC. They see all men as abusers and all women as victims.
This is not true. Amy Wilkins was removed from academia for being a predator. Others like Amanda Stevenson, S/h/a/n/t/e/l Buggs, and V/i/v/i/a/n Shaw are basically blacklisted in SOC because they are seen as abusers.
-
how r bug and sttevenson "basically blacklisted in SOC"? both work in MRM soc departments with PhD programs.. v shaw works in the harvard soc department
Particularly in SOC. They see all men as abusers and all women as victims.
This is not true. Amy Wilkins was removed from academia for being a predator. Others like Amanda Stevenson, S/h/a/n/t/e/l Buggs, and V/i/v/i/a/n Shaw are basically blacklisted in SOC because they are seen as abusers.