Leila Rupp and Verta Taylor
Becoming the “Professors of Lebsian Love”
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J155v09n04_03
Two lebsian mesesearchers sob life stories
-
Published 2008, why didn't Trump stop this from continuing?
Good question. Actually all the corporate grooming abuse stuff that people are finally complaining about now had been ongoing but reasonably subtle for decades (so subtle that complaining about it was seen as fringe), yet then got much, much worse pretty much immediately after Trump was president when we started to see all kinds of extreme sexualization of children (drag queens stripping for children, child drag queens dancing erotically for adults, children being trained to do a/n/a/l s/e/x in elementary school) coming from the Democrats while Trump barely said anything about it at all.
-
Published 2008, why didn't Trump stop this from continuing?
Good question. Actually all the corporate grooming abuse stuff that people are finally complaining about now had been ongoing but reasonably subtle for decades (so subtle that complaining about it was seen as fringe), yet then got much, much worse pretty much immediately after Trump was president when we started to see all kinds of extreme sexualization of children (drag queens stripping for children, child drag queens dancing erotically for adults, children being trained to do a/n/a/l s/e/x in elementary school) coming from the Democrats while Trump barely said anything about it at all.The study was published for adults nearly 15 years ago. It's been cited once. This has nothing to do with your paranoia.
-
It's S just trying to give a rise out of a contrarian argument that is predictably mediocre in supporting evidence, internal consistency and writing. .
Next come angry, overwrought replies that do not engage with the well-reasoned rebuttals. Finally, closing with a nonsequitur about phil or someone else who nobody really cares about. -
yeah even if it is, which it certainly will not, it is not a big deal.
try being online less. go outside more. try to make new friends. maybe even go to therapy. you'll find yourself happier and more fulfilled and less preoccupied about a random journal article about lesbians.
This will be assigned for little girls to read in elementary school soon along with coloring books of Disney princesses making out with each other if Republicans don't take back political power by any means necessary.
-
the "grooming" thing and QAnon stuff is a lot of projection. They think everyone would abuse children if they could because they want to.
Right, just like every white liberal who complains about racism is secretly revealing their desire to murder black men. Do you agree?
Who said anything about "QAnon" anyway? You must watch more than 4 hours of MSNBC/CNN per day to invoke this.
Corporate abuse grooming against children is happening very openly. I don't know whether you're not aware of this? Are you saying that there is not messed up stuff happening with children, such as child drag queens dancing erotically dancing for adults in the name of "queer liberation," or young children being trained to have a/n/a/l s/e/x in elementary school per the present Democrats' understanding of "civil rights"? That's all actually happening.
I never said anything remotely like "Q" talking points about politicians being secret reptilian extrater/restrials harvesting adrenochrome. So go away with that. -
yeah even if it is, which it certainly will not, it is not a big deal.
I was engaging in rhetorical hyperbole in saying Democrats would assign this specific essay to children, but they certainly want to assign similar things to very young children. The fact that you think this is "not a big deal" just shows how utterly sick one side of the political debate in America actually is now.
-
Are you saying that there is not messed up stuff happening with children, such as child drag queens dancing erotically dancing for adults in the name of "queer liberation," or young children being trained to have a/n/a/l s/e/x in elementary school per the present Democrats' understanding of "civil rights"? That's all actually happening.
Reality: The public library has "drag story time" where a few people wearing make-up do a Lady Gaga singalong with kids and their parents:
You: Young children are being trained to do a/n/a/l by Nancy Pelosi.
-
It's S just trying to give a rise out of a contrarian argument that is predictably mediocre in supporting evidence, internal consistency and writing. .
Next come angry, overwrought replies that do not engage with the well-reasoned rebuttals. Finally, closing with a nonsequitur about phil or someone else who nobody really cares about.This doesn't seem anything like S. Are you sure you're ok? This is making me wonder how much of what is blamed on "S" is just stuff posted by other people.
Also how is something "contrarian" if the majority of the public agree? -
Reality: The public library has "drag story time" where a few people wearing make-up do a Lady Gaga singalong with kids and their parents:
You: Young children are being trained to do a/n/a/l by Nancy Pelosi.Young children are indeed being trained at school how to do a/n/a/l in liberal districts in the name of "gay rights":
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pedophilia-culture-promoted-in-texas-schoolsYou sure you want to defend "drag story time"?
-
I'm putting it 67% probability of an S post. It looks like S showing restraint, but maybe it is another tr00l.
It's a forgivable mistake. S posted about this obsessively for a while.
Also, catch up. Of course white libs are d0rkz. Even the corporate neoliberal wokesters know that! Trashing MSNBC is necessary, but it's a bit passe.
-
Actually, it pretty much has to be S. Unless someone found this dying site in the last two weeks, everyone has seen the entirety of the front page blow up with S posts and other threads derailed by S fighting with their dead namer, or whatever its called.
Pretending to not know who S is is an over reach.
-
I've posted about this as I've seen others do but I have no idea who S is?
This is basically the single core issue in American political discourse now, have you not realized that?
The populist anger happening is not (directly) about economics or race, it's against the Democrats "queering" children in public schools, viewing that as extreme abuse behind thin veneer of civil rights.
In reality the "queering" of children by forces behind the Democrats probably does have a type of economic motivation, or it looks pretty much like the same thing spelled out in Brave New World, or abuse as means of creating consumerist automatons.
They're literally showing little kids cartoon images of a lube bottle with a happy face next to an instruction text about how to have a/n/a/l s/e/x. That's dystopian abuse of children. If you're not bothered by that I think you're a bad person and you shouldn't be around children.