Grollbaby is back on twitter & promoting a blog post he wrote in 2018.
The Comeback
-
If you have the same politics as a commercial for Dawn dish soap, you are not a true leftist.
This is funny, because most corporate Democrat sociologists legitimately have their political views determined for them by Nike commercials.
Jessie Daniels and Letisha have literally tweeted videos of Nike commercials. That's the extreme corporate bias of Democrat-aligned pseudo-scholars. -
No tweets at EAG's old account which was banned. Did he engage in ban evasion by creating a new account? That account could also be banned, if so. The MyPillow guy was re-banned after evading.
Shouldn't EAG be trying to find employment? I've heard his present economic situation is dire after he was fired from two jobs this year with no other prospects for work (as he has no employable skills outside grievance, and that's no longer in demand).
-
Oh, I see he did get a new job as a "consultant." I wonder if Rapey Grollmonster will last as long at that job ashe did at the diversity coordinator job where he was fired after two months for reasons that totally had nothing to do with harassment, misconduct, or his criminal record.
-
Sounds very neoliberal.
Isn't EAG quite the stereotypical corporate "woke" neoliberal, by all typical leftist standards of discourse?
Or wait... are you the weird angry corporate Democrat guy who always rants about Adolph Reed because he uses words that are too big for you to understand, and because he says things that are different from MSNBC, and talks about how corporations use foundations like Ford and Rockefeller to control "liberal" politics? And you think simply pointing at Reed and going "leftists say 'neoliberal' hawhawhaw" is a way to refute leftist attacks on your inane corporate Democrat ideology?
-
Very very neoliberally of you to say that.
Sounds very neoliberal.
Isn't EAG quite the stereotypical corporate "woke" neoliberal, by all typical leftist standards of discourse?
Or wait... are you the weird angry corporate Democrat guy who always rants about Adolph Reed because he uses words that are too big for you to understand, and because he says things that are different from MSNBC, and talks about how corporations use foundations like Ford and Rockefeller to control "liberal" politics? And you think simply pointing at Reed and going "leftists say 'neoliberal' hawhawhaw" is a way to refute leftist attacks on your inane corporate Democrat ideology? -
Sounds very neoliberal.
The fact that you don't understand what this word means and you spend your entire life in rage against the political left doesn't mean you're clever.
Go continue on with your twitter crusade against Jacobin and AMLO while saying that corporate foundations are "the real left," semi-literate MSNBC bro.
-
Very very neoliberally of you to say that.
What is so funny about this word to you?
You've spent like five years on this site in belligerent rage against leftists for talking about how Democrats are a neoliberal party controlled by corporations. I'd think in the present political climate you'd have better things to do than "fighting the far-left" and reenacting your 2015 crusade against the imaginary "Bernie bros."
-
Very woke of you to presume that I don't know what the word means.
Woke and neoliberal.
You probably get a lot of Ford Foundation grants and are friends with Rachel Maddow.
Sounds very neoliberal.
The fact that you don't understand what this word means and you spend your entire life in rage against the political left doesn't mean you're clever.
Go continue on with your twitter crusade against Jacobin and AMLO while saying that corporate foundations are "the real left," semi-literate MSNBC bro. -
Here's Adolph Reed discussing neoliberalism:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3I know you hate Reed, and instead of reading that you would rather huff f/a/r/t/s from Mayor Pete's neoliberal ass. But try actually exposing yourself someday to information from political sources further left than MSNBC. Groveling in ignorance like a hog in feces just because you can't understand the meaning of a word that is constantly used in political discourse is a bad look.
-
You are probably wearing Air Jordans when you posted this link. Such a neoliberal move.
Here's Adolph Reed discussing neoliberalism:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3
I know you hate Reed, and instead of reading that you would rather huff f/a/r/t/s from Mayor Pete's neoliberal ass. But try actually exposing yourself someday to information from political sources further left than MSNBC. Groveling in ignorance like a hog in feces just because you can't understand the meaning of a word that is constantly used in political discourse is a bad look. -
Very woke of you to presume that I don't know what the word means.
Woke and neoliberal.
You probably get a lot of Ford Foundation grants and are friends with Rachel Maddow."Haw haw, anti-capitalist leftists hate corporate foundations and corporate media, so to mock the left, I'll just repeat what they say in order to pretend that leftist political views are unintelligent!"
Right-wing attempts at "humor" are pretty bad. You're proving that point.
Humor has to be subversive to work. Presenting yourself in worshipful awe of corporate power and thinking any anti-capitalist disourse is "hilarious" and should be mocked (without explaining your objections) really does not count as any sort of subversion at all."I can't understand or refute leftist criticisms of corporate-aligned right-wing neoliberal Democrats, so I just repeat what they say in mocking tone!!" -- you in every post
-
You are probably wearing Air Jordans when you posted this link. Such a neoliberal move.
"DEMOCRATS ARE NOT A NEOLIBERAL PARTY AND WOKEISM IS NOT SPONSORED BY CORPORATE POWER!! THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION DID NOT COORDINATE NAZI EUGENICS PROGRAMS!! THE FORD FOUNDATION IS NOT A RIGHT-WING CIA FRONT THAT SABOTAGED LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS DURING THE COLD WAR!!"
-
You probably went to University of Chicago and majored in economics.
You are probably wearing Air Jordans when you posted this link. Such a neoliberal move.
"DEMOCRATS ARE NOT A NEOLIBERAL PARTY AND WOKEISM IS NOT SPONSORED BY CORPORATE POWER!! THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION DID NOT COORDINATE NAZI EUGENICS PROGRAMS!! THE FORD FOUNDATION IS NOT A RIGHT-WING CIA FRONT THAT SABOTAGED LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS DURING THE COLD WAR!!"