Apparently our sh/i]t is not together, and one should not believe a word we publish:
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-soc-090221-035954
This is a legit critique.
You won’t get replication in sociology because sociology’s roots are in a sociopolitical outlook and not the scientific method. This is why economics, psychology, and even criminology leave it in the dust.
Yours was a pointless post.
Everyone of the disciplines you named has readily admitted that they have the same problem.
This is a legit critique.
https://replicationnetwork.com/2017/03/15/campbell-on-perverse-incentives-and-replication-in-science/
You won�t get replication in sociology because sociology�s roots are in a sociopolitical outlook and not the scientific method. This is why economics, psychology, and even criminology leave it in the dust.
Yours was a pointless post.
Everyone of the disciplines you named has readily admitted that they have the same problem.
This is a legit critique.
https://replicationnetwork.com/2017/03/15/campbell-on-perverse-incentives-and-replication-in-science/
You won?t get replication in sociology because sociology?s roots are in a sociopolitical outlook and not the scientific method. This is why economics, psychology, and even criminology leave it in the dust.
And what do you think a publication in the Annual Review of SOCIOLOGY constitutes?
It�s made worse by the anti-positivist rahtahrds that have come to dominate the discipline.
This is the sort of thing someone says when they don’t know what positivism is or what science is doing.
Positivism died in the physical sciences first. We’ve been over this.
https://www.socjobrumors.com/topic/positivism-in-hard-sciences
(Citation on the last page)
Oh, it looks like the most important part got deleted.
Y'all clearly didn't read the article. It doesn't actually make the claim that sociology doesn't replicate. Such a claim is actually ir/reconcilable with their conclusion.
Massive fail, econ undergrads. Try harder.
Yours was a pointless post.
Everyone of the disciplines you named has readily admitted that they have the same problem.
This is a legit critique.
https://replicationnetwork.com/2017/03/15/campbell-on-perverse-incentives-and-replication-in-science/
You won?t get replication in sociology because sociology?s roots are in a sociopolitical outlook and not the scientific method. This is why economics, psychology, and even criminology leave it in the dust.
No they don’t. Psychology actively publishes replications in its journals. Dozens of criminology studies have gone through replication through the Campbell initiative. Economists have multiple working papers series that include replication. Sociology could care less. Because it’s a lightweight discipline driven by ideology not science.
"Those disciplines have problems with replication" isn't the same as "Those disciplines don't replicate."
Yours was a pointless post.
Everyone of the disciplines you named has readily admitted that they have the same problem.
This is a legit critique.
https://replicationnetwork.com/2017/03/15/campbell-on-perverse-incentives-and-replication-in-science/
You won?t get replication in sociology because sociology?s roots are in a sociopolitical outlook and not the scientific method. This is why economics, psychology, and even criminology leave it in the dust.
No they don�t. Psychology actively publishes replications in its journals. Dozens of criminology studies have gone through replication through the Campbell initiative. Economists have multiple working papers series that include replication. Sociology could care less. Because it�s a lightweight discipline driven by ideology not science.
Oh, it looks like the most important part got deleted.
Y'all clearly didn't read the article. It doesn't actually make the claim that sociology doesn't replicate.
It actually does make that claim! Sociology comes out as one of the worst social sciences wrt replication.
Oh, it looks like the most important part got deleted.
Y'all clearly didn't read the article. It doesn't actually make the claim that sociology doesn't replicate.
It actually does make that claim! Sociology comes out as one of the worst social sciences wrt replication.
Quote the claim from outside the abstract.
Replication is only for you positivists. The world changes� and you can reduce its operations to some replicable fixed relationships between static variables
I love the people stanning for positivism and science, while clearly having no idea what positivism is and how the hard sciences feel about it.
I love the people stanning for positivism and science, while clearly having no idea what positivism is and how the hard sciences feel about it.
I love the caliber of intellect on display in this thread:
"SHEEZE YOU GUYS, C'MON WE AAAAALL KNOW POSITIVISM IS STUPID, RIGHT? C'MON. YOU KNOW. YOU KNOW."
"NUH-UH YOU A BIG DUMMIE ME-SEARCHER"
"OH YEAH, WELL YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT POSITIVISM IS. I KNOW WHAT POSITIVISM IS. I'M A SMARTIE. I EVEN READ KUHN. BET YOU HAVEN'T READ KUHN!"
Talk about ideas or stfu you nitwits.