• 7 months - 26 posts - Latest - RSS
• OP: 4 Goods vs 3 No Goods
• Thread: 138 Goods vs 66 No Goods

1. Sociologist
   94d5
   

   Game of Loans is BS propaganda written by a neocon Manhattan Institute hack from the Bush administration, trying to paper over the very, very real student loan crisis by unconvincingly asserting that our eyes do not see what our eyes see.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

2. Sociologist
   eb57
   

   Loan crisis is bad and getting worse. Will likely lead to another housing crash.

   That said, there were probably other reasons this paper got rejected (<10%) acceptance rate.

   This is about the journal's ridiculous review time and leadership.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

3. Sociologist
   9114
   

   Hi Sara.

   Game of Loans is BS propaganda written by a neocon Manhattan Institute hack from the Bush administration, trying to paper over the very, very real student loan crisis by unconvincingly asserting that our eyes do not see what our eyes see.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

4. Sociologist
   3884
   

   How is the journal? Turn around time? Good reviews? I would be interested in recent experiences...

   took me EIGHT months to get reviews back.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

5. Sociologist
   66b3
   

   3 mostly positive reviews and a letter saying the editor "consulted an advisory editor" and based on their comments (which were not communicated to me) decided to reject the manuscript. Don't know why I bother with them.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

6. Sociologist
   f31c
   

   3 mostly positive reviews and a letter saying the editor "consulted an advisory editor" and based on their comments (which were not communicated to me) decided to reject the manuscript. Don't know why I bother with them.

   Peer review at its very best.

   7 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

Reply