https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3
Discuss.
SJW's are corporate neoliberals
-
SJW's in the United States are sponsored by the exact same oligarchic interests that backed Hitler in Germany.
I'm surprised there are still entities in the United States named after Ford and Rockefeller. Wasn't there some big fuss about things like this and weren't centers named for Woodrow Wilson getting renamed and all that?
Think about the hypocrisy of "activists" seeking to pull down Confederate monuments who work for foundations still named after designers/perpetrators of the Holocaust. The Rockefeller Foundation was even directly involved in sponsoring eugenics labs in Nazi Germany. No wonder these corporate 'philanthropric' entities are so obsessed with race and regimenting the citizenry according to race, they've had that same obsession and praxis for a century. -
Like Google, Apple and Facebook?
SJW's in the United States are sponsored by the exact same oligarchic interests that backed Hitler in Germany.The Ford and Rockefeller oligarchic interests based in the United States were strong backers of Hitler, and also are probably the primary backers of BLM in the US. Rockefeller Foundation helped coordinate the Holocaust and helps coordinate BLM. IBM helped coordinate the Holocaust and gives money to BLM. etc.
-
Also Ford and Rockefeller foundations are the primary sponsors of most of the neoliberal racial ideologies decried in the above article that dominate US academia.
What proportion of academic departments, papers, and positions can be traced to them? I've had a conversation with someone before on this, and they bailed.
-
How are we still dealing with this? Of course sociologists are aware of this. We wrote the stuff on corporate pinkwashing etc. Yet non-sociologists who insist they know enough about us to bash the entire discipline repeatedly share this information as a gotcha.
We don’t care.
We know this. We know that BLM got violent. We’ve had conservative undergrads ask why we can’t have a white pride parade and “what about Black Hebrew Israelites.” We’ve had students defend speakers who are desperately trying to get canceled. We have wealthy Igbo students. Many of us work with psychologists and know why nobody takes BW, Mr. K, NC, OP et. al seriously. Some of whom I suspect are here.
None of this is new to us. You don’t have novel contributions. It’s boring. It isn’t challenging. Granted, you guys might be bright enough to own some undergraduate SJWs on Twitter and Reddit. But for the two sociologists who still visit and actually care to engage here, you’re out of your league. I rarely come here anymore. I check occasionally to see if we have improved. How are you still persisting in this garbage all day, every day, six months later?
-
Also Ford and Rockefeller foundations are the primary sponsors of most of the neoliberal racial ideologies decried in the above article that dominate US academia.
What proportion of academic departments, papers, and positions can be traced to them? I've had a conversation with someone before on this, and they bailed.I mean, Kimberle Crenshaw is the origin of "intersectionality theory" and is also directly employed by the Rockefeller Foundation.
A pretty large percentage of "critical race theorists" receive scholarships from the Ford-Rockefeller interests -- I haven't seen exact data on this, but this includes many individuals discussed often on this forum.
(Even Victor Ray got a Ford Foundation scholarship, for chrissake. That's the transsubstantiated blood of black children murdered in Africa by western corporate interests directly fueling the comfortable livelihoods of liberal race poseurs like VR.)Regarding BLM, Ford Foundation literally gave them hundreds of millions of dollars. There's huge money behind the neoliberal racial project.
-
How are we still dealing with this? Of course sociologists are aware of this. We wrote the stuff on corporate pinkwashing etc. Yet non-sociologists who insist they know enough about us to bash the entire discipline repeatedly share this information as a gotcha.
We don�t care.
We know this. We know that BLM got violent. We�ve had conservative undergrads ask why we can�t have a white pride parade and �what about Black Hebrew Israelites.� We�ve had students defend speakers who are desperately trying to get canceled. We have wealthy Igbo students. Many of us work with psychologists and know why nobody takes BW, Mr. K, NC, OP et. al seriously. Some of whom I suspect are here.
None of this is new to us. You don�t have novel contributions. It�s boring. It isn�t challenging. Granted, you guys might be bright enough to own some undergraduate SJWs on Twitter and Reddit. But for the two sociologists who still visit and actually care to engage here, you�re out of your league. I rarely come here anymore. I check occasionally to see if we have improved. How are you still persisting in this garbage all day, every day, six months later?Nice non-response saying "I am too smart to respond to any of your points because they are stupid." You posture as an alleged professor yet would fail any high school debate class miserably.
If Reed's points were in fact so well-understood by American sociologists, why haven't they internalized his argument, and changed their strategy away from the methods he criticizes?