Trans university professor sparks fury after claiming sexual attraction to children isn't always immoral: Wants to destigmatize pedophilia and use term 'Minor-Attracted Persons' instead
"Sexual attraction to children isn't always immoral"
-
It's ALWAYS a sociologist. Always. Nice to know this person took the job from hardworking, normal, straight, non-pedophile white folks with ten times the publication record.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/old-dominion-professor-statement-minor-attracted-personsWho are the other sociologists defending p e d o s? The most famous people defending this “MAP” stuff are in psych.
-
I think we all pretty much understand now why nobody outside of sociology cares about sociology. The discipline is now the “island of misfit toys.” But instead of a train with square wheels, it’s a pedophile doing “me-search” to self-servingly normalize his illness.
-
Who's defending this pedo? How about everyone on the hiring committee, for starters.
It's ALWAYS a sociologist. Always. Nice to know this person took the job from hardworking, normal, straight, non-pedophile white folks with ten times the publication record.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/old-dominion-professor-statement-minor-attracted-persons
Who are the other sociologists defending p e d o s? The most famous people defending this �MAP� stuff are in psych. -
I was initially indifferent about the whole pronouns in the email signature thing. I thought it was silly, advised some students to avoid it on the off chance some potential employer somewhere might have something against it, etc. After thinking it over more, I'm very glad that about the people who do it because it is an easy, low cost way for me to red flag we irdos, p dos, insuf ferable vir chew signalers, and others who I would like to avoid.
-
Low level discussion ITT. One could argue that a person who is attracted to children but never acts on it is admirable for their restraint. Heroic, even.
LOL Sure, one can argue anything. I have an urge to reape adolescent girls, but I don't act on it. My restraint is admirable, even heroic.
-
It's ALWAYS a sociologist. Always. Nice to know this person took the job from hardworking, normal, straight, non-pedophile white folks with ten times the publication record.
it is more often someone from "X studies" department. I am sure he applied for jobs in gender studies and ghey/kueer studies departments.
-
Low level discussion ITT. One could argue that a person who is attracted to children but never acts on it is admirable for their restraint. Heroic, even.
LOL Sure, one can argue anything. I have an urge to reape adolescent girls, but I don't act on it. My restraint is admirable, even heroic.You’re the modal case though. Most normal men are in the same category. Why con/demn this author for studying the phenomenon? It seems like a legitimate research topic to me.
-
Low level discussion ITT. One could argue that a person who is attracted to children but never acts on it is admirable for their restraint. Heroic, even.
LOL Sure, one can argue anything. I have an urge to reape adolescent girls, but I don't act on it. My restraint is admirable, even heroic.
You�re the modal case though. Most normal men are in the same category. Why con/demn this author for studying the phenomenon? It seems like a legitimate research topic to me.LOLOLOLOLOL "Modal case". No, most normal men are not in that category. Unless they are ghey of course, it is well-known that ghey men are pedos. No one has condemned him for the research topic but for defending pedos. So I guess he is defending you.