Oh no, it's the demise of the whyyte man! It's a reversal of civilization! A decline in prosperity! A complete tragedy. Oh wait, boooo hoooo, who cares?
Rough time to be a white male in sociology or criminology
-
No one would care if the minorities being hired were qualified. But I'm not seeing a lot of Ruth Peterson's out there. Schools are just hiring marginally qualified blacks and hispanics because the pool of qualified PoC is so shallow. It's sad really. I left sociology for a crim department years ago to escape the SJW nonsense but the trend is infecting crim every bit as badly, save for a few and ever-shrinking number of departments.
-
So we have to listen to your drivel because you're a snwflac who couldn't cut it.
Got it.
Welcome to the free market.
No one would care if the minorities being hired were qualified. But I'm not seeing a lot of Ruth Peterson's out there. Schools are just hiring marginally qualified blacks and hispanics because the pool of qualified PoC is so shallow. It's sad really. I left sociology for a crim department years ago to escape the SJW nonsense but the trend is infecting crim every bit as badly, save for a few and ever-shrinking number of departments.
-
i am the original poster of that comment about the job markets elsewhere. To the person who replied, ppl like are the reason why qualified whyt men are not hired. You need some reading comprehension and analytical thinking classes if that is what you understood from my post
Ypu bring up an important point.
Under-represented minorities worked to change the field to make it more open to them.
Yte guys in sociology don't do that.
So, they're deloosional, dmb, AND lazy.
sociology outside usa and canada does.
why? it is because their sociology is not yet corporatized and a corporatist logic does not function there. there is not a similar market where the more victim you are the better. ppl actually think of you as unst@b-l-e to decry something every other day and do NOT hire you. They dg@f if you are NB, transracial, Latinx etc.
Sociology doesn't hire yte men, so every yte man pursuing a sociology PHD is delooseional and lacks Ntelligence.
Prove me wrong. -
I understand.
You don't like the free market and you want aphirmative action for yte men in sociology.
i am the original poster of that comment about the job markets elsewhere. To the person who replied, ppl like are the reason why qualified whyt men are not hired. You need some reading comprehension and analytical thinking classes if that is what you understood from my post
Ypu bring up an important point.
Under-represented minorities worked to change the field to make it more open to them.
Yte guys in sociology don't do that.
So, they're deloosional, dmb, AND lazy.
sociology outside usa and canada does.
why? it is because their sociology is not yet corporatized and a corporatist logic does not function there. there is not a similar market where the more victim you are the better. ppl actually think of you as unst@b-l-e to decry something every other day and do NOT hire you. They dg@f if you are NB, transracial, Latinx etc.
Sociology doesn't hire yte men, so every yte man pursuing a sociology PHD is delooseional and lacks Ntelligence.
Prove me wrong. -
Would universal education, nurition, and healthcare be included?
Here's a proposal - worldwide university standard for hiring - IQ test with 100 as the cut-off. All PoC in Sociology who pass the test are guaranteed a tenure track job. Anyone failing the test must go to work in retail.
SJWs do you take this offer? -
You thinking education, nutrition, and healthcare are unrelated to test scores means that it's safe to say that there's a retail job in your future.
We/ird non sequitur. This thread is a good example of why no one takes SJWs seriously--they are not intelligent and cannot construct a coherent argument.
-
You thinking education, nutrition, and healthcare are unrelated to test scores means that it's safe to say that there's a retail job in your future.
We/ird non sequitur. This thread is a good example of why no one takes SJWs seriously--they are not intelligent and cannot construct a coherent argument.They are, but letting a bunch of d/u/m/b bIack SJWs be professors won't address that and would probably make it even worse.
-
There is discrimin@tion based on political ideology via diversity statements etc and colorism
Soc faculty are no longer capable of running their searches. HR should select the finalists based on pubs, grants, etc and then the faculty should choose between the top 3 or 4 HR flies out.