Topalli
Loughran
Haynie
Sweeten
Tseolini
What do we think? Is this an upgrade over McDowall, Miller, Hay? Wondering if I should hold off on submission or go for it now.
New Editorial Team for Criminology
-
Topalli
Loughran
Haynie
Sweeten
Tseolini
What do we think? Is this an upgrade over McDowall, Miller, Hay? Wondering if I should hold off on submission or go for it now.Depends on what your paper is about. If it’s sone woke dreck then do it now so Jody Miller can applaud you for your use of neutral pronouns and pro-trans stance. Also helps if you are a disabled, brown, female, trans, blah blah.
-
The last 3 years for Criminology has been a disaster. McDowall did not handle the ES thing well, and Jody Miller has pushed the most inane woke crusade to change the language authors use so as to not upset the .000003% of the population that is trans.
This new group seems super solid all the way. They have impeccable credentials and there is a good balance of qualitative and quantitative know-how.
-
Topalli and Loughran good, who the F are the rest of these clowns?
Topalli
Loughran
Haynie
Sweeten
Tseolini
What do we think? Is this an upgrade over McDowall, Miller, Hay? Wondering if I should hold off on submission or go for it now.If you don't know who Haynie is then you clearly have no idea who the big players are in crim.
-
Dana Haynie is a clown? Are you bonkers? Look these people up. Why do you need someone to explain who they are to you?
Topalli and Loughran good, who the F are the rest of these clowns?
Topalli
Loughran
Haynie
Sweeten
Tseolini
What do we think? Is this an upgrade over McDowall, Miller, Hay? Wondering if I should hold off on submission or go for it now. -
Topalli and Loughgran: Co-chief eds. (well respected, both)
Co-eds
Gary Sweeten: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xXOtTN3rOhkJ&hl=en&oi=ao (3800 cites)
Andromachi Tseolini: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=pz14fFwAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao (4,100 cites)
Dana Haynie: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=INTiP24AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao (8,000 cites)
Translation: Rock solid team of editors. No complaints here. Whoever said they were clowns needs to check themselves.
-
Its not the number of cites but rather the fact that they have a decent number of them. The reason for linking to the google scholar pages is to see WHERE they published as well. All of them publish in top journals.All of them have made solid contributions in their respective areas. I could easily see them as society fellows eventually. What's your problem with them? Not woke enough for you?
-
He’s a Nagin student. Trained in a policy program, so yes, very Econ oriented (like Shawn Bushway). His stuff is smart though and he gets theory. I’m not sure what you mean by ideological. He and Topalli will bring sone good balance methodologically speaking.
I know Loughran -- he is /s/m/a/rt but q/ui/te co/ns/ervative
and he is v dis/mis/sive of stu/d/ies /h/e di/sag/rees with id/eolog/i/c//a/l/l/y.
So an economist-wannabe?