Journal of Homosexuality = supportive of child molestation

10 months - 78 posts - Latest - RSS
OP: 13 Goods vs 10 No Goods
Thread: 220 Goods vs 168 No Goods

Sociology Job Market Rumors » Sociology » Research / Journals

Journal of Homosexuality = supportive of child molestation

« Previous 123 4 Next »

Sociologist
5cc9

The 1994 march was the "Spirit of Stonewall" march not a NAMBLA march you L/U/N/A/T/I/C.

The 1994 "Spirt of Stonewall" march was held without permit specifically as a protest against the official city gay pride parade which prohibited NAMBLA's inclusion.

It was specifically a pro-NAMBLA march, announced as such by Har/ry Hay during the press conference calling it:
https://www.nambla.org/sosconference1994.html

Why would you pretend that the SOS march was not specifically initiated in support of NAMBLA? You want people to not know about this for some reason?

Your disinfo reminds me of Tucker Carlson -- spot/ted with some ac/curate facts, but twisted into non/se/nse by your de/lir/ious par/a/noia. There's a kernel of truth in many things you wrote, but it's all di/sto/rted so much that it bears no resembl/ance to the tru/th.
Deb/unking each l/i/e would take too long and be poi/ntless, because you are a nev/eren/ding fou/ntain of lies and pay no attention when your li/es are de/bun/ked.

Seems more like you can't accept plain evidence even when it's placed right in front of you, and you feel the need to tell lies like that SOS was not a NAMBLA march.
The fact that you would react like this really says a lot about where your psyche is presently at on this subject.
I hope you get the help you need before you harm a child.

10 months ago # QUOTE 6 GOOD 4 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

And as a matter of fact, the very existence of the SOS march reveals that by 1994, the mainstream lgbt rights movement had completely distanced itself from NAMBLA and the more fringe positions that this fre/ak 5cc9 is fr/othing at the mouth about.

[2/3]

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

I hope you get the help you need before you harm a child.

LOL this is what I have said to you like 10 times in other threads (because I honestly think you are someone battling some pe/do urges).

Your lack of imagination is frankly s/hocking. Harvey, tell it to us straight: do you have aphasia?

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

Here is the original petition sent regarding the SOS march:
https://www.brongersma.info/Spirit_of_Stonewall

It was absolutely initiated to protest the exclusion of NAMBLA from the official 1994 gay rights parade in New York City.

And as a matter of fact, the very existence of the SOS march reveals that by 1994, the mainstream lgbt rights movement had completely distanced itself from NAMBLA and the more fringe positions that this fre/ak 5cc9 is fr/othing at the mouth about.
[2/3]

"Completely"? No, check those ILGA statements that continued into the 1990s.

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

For an/yone else re/ading: Syl/via and other t/r/ns acti/vists joined the Sp/irit of Stonewal/l cou/nter-march in 1994 because they were in/c/e/nsed that the 25th an/ni/versa/ry march didn't include t/ran/s in its ti/t/le. Her par/ticip/ation had nothing to do with NAMBLA, despite the ra/mb/lings of this l/un/a/tic.

[1/3]

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

For the plan/ni/ng of the HU/GE ma/r/ch with tens of thousands of pa/rti/cip/ants, the march that everyone fo/cus/ed on and rem/em/bers, the Stonewall 25 lea/ders took many many votes about whether to include NAMBLA and voted against it every si/ngle time. As Sus/an Je/ster said to the Ad/vocate, "it was d/eb/ated and d/eba/ted and d/eb/ated, and it was con/si/stently voted down." Yes there was a ti/ny group who thought the march should include anyone who wanted to march, but the /v/as/t ma/j/ority d/i/sa/g/r/ee/d. So sh/ut your ef/fing mouth, you're get/ting on my nerv/es.

[3/3]

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

I hope you get the help you need before you harm a child.
LOL this is what I have said to you like 10 times in other threads (because I honestly think you are someone battling some pe/do urges).
Your lack of imagination is frankly s/hocking. Harvey, tell it to us straight: do you have aphasia?

Don't pretend you know what the word "aphasia" means and don't call other people the names of your p/3/d/0/phile Democrat "queers". That's your child-rape hero, the US Empire even names war machines after him (the US military does to other nations what Harvey Milk did to underage boys?).

Why exactly are you lying and pretending the SOS parade was not initiated to support NAMBLA? I don't see any plausible reason why a person would be deliberately denying true statements about the obviously central role in the gay rights movement that was played by pedophilia activists until the mid-1990s.
Yeah that tendency went "underground" for many obvious reasons, but continued its "long march through institutions" with rebranding policies (advocated directly by Hay) and today has enacted abusive policies against children NAMBLA could have never dreamed of, such as training young children in school to have a/n/a/l s/e/x.

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

For the plan/ni/ng of the HU/GE ma/r/ch with tens of thousands of pa/rti/cip/ants, the march that everyone fo/cus/ed on and rem/em/bers, the Stonewall 25 lea/ders took many many votes about whether to include NAMBLA and voted against it every si/ngle time. As Sus/an Je/ster said to the Ad/vocate, "it was d/eb/ated and d/eba/ted and d/eb/ated, and it was con/si/stently voted down." Yes there was a ti/ny group who thought the march should include anyone who wanted to march, but the /v/as/t ma/j/ority d/i/sa/g/r/ee/d. So sh/ut your ef/fing mouth, you're get/ting on my nerv/es.
[3/3]

You're now conflating Stonewall 25 and SOS as somehow the same march?
Stonewall 25 was the official, city sanctioned parade. SOS was the "rebel" parade held without permit to protest S25's exclusion of NAMBLA. This shouldn't be so difficult for you to comprehend.

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

For an/yone else re/ading: Syl/via and other t/r/ns acti/vists joined the Sp/irit of Stonewal/l cou/nter-march in 1994 because they were in/c/e/nsed that the 25th an/ni/versa/ry march didn't include t/ran/s in its ti/t/le. Her par/ticip/ation had nothing to do with NAMBLA, despite the ra/mb/lings of this l/un/a/tic.
[1/3]

^ This is explicitly false.
SOS was announced specifically by the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) and NAMBLA. It was literally a march directly sponsored by NAMBLA, in support of NAMBLA.
Rivera was a GLF member.

Rivera was a long-time ally of David Thorstad (a co-founder of NAMBLA) as both were early core members of Gay Activists Alliance (GAA).
Many of the early gay activist groups have strongly overlapping membership and the social networks are easy to chart.
Rivera identified as a gay male drag queen.

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

Here are the Stonewall vets discussing the SOS.

Notice no NAMBLA.

http://www.stonewallvets.org/SpiritofStonewall.htm

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

and the NYT:

https://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/06/nyregion/remember-stonewall-but-how-g
/
ay-groups-clash-over-commemoration-of-a-riot-in-1969.html

(no NAMBLA)

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

Sor/ry Harvey but you're wrong again. You should really look at sources other than Infowars!!!!

OH AND STOP MOL/ESTING LITTLE BOYS. Read Allyn Walker's book, it could save a child if it stops you from acting on your s/ick urges.

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

Sor/ry Harvey but you're wrong again. You should really look at sources other than Infowars!!!!
OH AND STOP MOL/ESTING LITTLE BOYS. Read Allyn Walker's book, it could save a child if it stops you from acting on your s/ick urges.

You're the one obsessively defending and lying about p/3/d/0/s. There's no real plausible reason anyone would do that unless they were a p/3/d/0 themselves.
I hope you get the help you need before you harm a child.
I bet you're Buggs with all the underage twitter followers you post explicit material for? Or are you Kolysh who shows hardcore xxx comics to her kids? Or KA who trained her "babysis" how to go down on a woman?

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
5cc9

I don't see any links to "Infowars." I posted the literal text of the press conference announcing the march that you obsessively are denying was held to promote NAMBLA (an organization that seeks to legalize child molestation).

Yeah, the mainstream gay rights movement by the mid-1990s had broken ties with the pedophilia movement, but that's where the "queer" label comes in. "Queer theory" as an ideology strongly embraces child molestation. "Queer" means being an ideological follower of Foucault and Butler, both of whom embraced ethics of pedophilia. Foucault raped children himself.

10 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
f60d

S/c/h/i/z/o/p/h/r/e/n/i/c t/r/o/l/l.

10 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
d108

It was specifically a pro-NAMBLA march, announced as such by Har/ry Hay during the press conference calling it:
https://www.nambla.org/sosconference1994.html

Here is the original petition sent regarding the SOS march:
https://www.brongersma.info/Spirit_of_Stonewall

"Spirit of Stonewall" refer/red not only to the march but also was used as a name of the collective of around 200 activists organizing the march. That collective in social terms was basically the membership of NAMBLA and GLF.

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

another NYT, no mention of NAMBLA:

https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/10/nyregion/g

/
ay-protest-march-planned-amid-stonewall-celebration.html

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

Tom Duane marched with SOS. Do you really think he would have marched in a NAMBLA march? God you're thi/ck.

7 NAMBLA di/psh/its were trying to take credit for it, but they were a fri/nge group.

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
8f73

Oh and if you think im clicking on your nambla link you have another think coming lol.

It's very telling that when i googled it, nambla was not in my search results, yet it was at the top of yours.

Did you know that google alters your search results based on what it predicts are your SECRET DE/S/IRES?

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !
Sociologist
d108

Tom Duane marched with SOS. Do you really think he would have marched in a NAMBLA march? God you're thi/ck.
7 NAMBLA di/psh/its were trying to take credit for it, but they were a fri/nge group.

NAMBLA was the literal cause for announcing the march and was openly described as such by Har/ry Hay who was the one that made the announcement. You've been shown the documentation directly multiple times. Is your brain so damaged from child p/*/r/n that you can't read at adult level?

I'm not sure what the statement about Duane attending would imply.
Tom Bonin, a Democrat who was chief justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court, was forced to resign after attending a fundraiser in support of accused child molesters in 1978.

10 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

« Previous 123 4 Next »

Journal of Homosexuality = supportive of child molestation

Reply »