so i read all of the articles in the sociology of race and ethnicity. they are are really bad. how come sociologists don't take the original race variable in datasets and log transform it? is it because you're too low iq for sophisticated economic methods?
I read all the sociology of race articles. here's why they're bad.
-
yes i read all of them. the names were so bad that i forgot them but i have exhaustive notes and not one knew how to log(race)
copy/paste �exhaustive� notes from a single article on race in the next couple minutes then. should be ezno because i'm going to publish them in Nature and get sociology kicked out of the universities
-
yes i read all of them. the names were so bad that i forgot them but i have exhaustive notes and not one knew how to log(race)
copy/paste ?exhaustive? notes from a single article on race in the next couple minutes then. should be ez
no because i'm going to publish them in Nature and get sociology kicked out of the universitiespretty sure posting notes for one article out of thousands won’t stop you from cancelling sociology
-
It is not allowed to be posted somewhere else while it is under review at a journal. I understand that rigorous scientific guidelines are too high IQ for sociologists aka socialists, but that's how it worked. And I'm not trying to cancel sociology; that's what liberals do. I'm trying to get it kicked out of the universities for being a fake science.
-
okay so cite 2 articles which make this mistake. surely since you’ve read all of them, sharing simple citations for a mere 2 papers, without hating your notes, should be just fine. it’s not like your argument hinges on just 2 articles, since you’re going to cancel all of sociology