Why is she really crying? This liberal bs is so annoying in this discipline
i know why the white lady cries
-
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
-
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
-
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing." -
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies.
-
Wilkins and Jesse Daniels?
S bragged about threatening ter/r/orism to get Wilkins fired and threatened to murder Jesse Daniels over similar ideological concerns being expressed here.
https://www.socjobrumors.com/topic/most-attacks-are-coming-from-one-user-proof
Don't feed the (insane) troll.
-
Oh, look, I'm going to write an article called "I Know Why the Inarticulate T/r/o/l/l Cries."
I'll make sure to mention you in the Acknowledgements.
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies. -
Oh, look, I'm going to write an article called "I Know Why the Inarticulate T/r/o/l/l Cries."
I'll make sure to mention you in the Acknowledgements.
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies.You sound like even du/mb/er than the du/mb white b/i/t/c/h who wrote the paper in the OP.
-
Wilkins and Jesse Daniels?
S bragged about threatening ter/r/orism to get Wilkins fired and threatened to murder Jesse Daniels over similar ideological concerns being expressed here.
https://www.socjobrumors.com/topic/most-attacks-are-coming-from-one-user-proof
Don't feed the (insane) troll.I posted the Wilkins reference and I’m not S. You seem low I Q.
-
My article will start in the present, when you're m/o/m gets upset that you're on the internet calling women names.
Then there will be a flashback to the past. This will be the official start of the article's historical section. I'll analyze all of your report cards and the comments that your teachers made about you.
Oh, look, I'm going to write an article called "I Know Why the Inarticulate T/r/o/l/l Cries."
I'll make sure to mention you in the Acknowledgements.
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies.
You sound like even du/mb/er than the du/mb white b/i/t/c/h who wrote the paper in the OP. -
My article will start in the present, when you're m/o/m gets upset that you're on the internet calling women names.
Then there will be a flashback to the past. This will be the official start of the article's historical section. I'll analyze all of your report cards and the comments that your teachers made about you.
Oh, look, I'm going to write an article called "I Know Why the Inarticulate T/r/o/l/l Cries."
I'll make sure to mention you in the Acknowledgements.
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies.
You sound like even du/mb/er than the du/mb white b/i/t/c/h who wrote the paper in the OP.This is one of the g/a/y/e/s/t things I've ever read on this website.
-
Then the ethnographic portion of the article will begin.
It will detail your anger and propensity for calling things g/a/y.
The psychoanalytic part of the article will address your latent feelings.
My article will start in the present, when you're m/o/m gets upset that you're on the internet calling women names.
...See full post
Then there will be a flashback to the past. This will be the official start of the article's historical section. I'll analyze all of your report cards and the comments that your teachers made about you.
Oh, look, I'm going to write an article called "I Know Why the Inarticulate T/r/o/l/l Cries."
I'll make sure to mention you in the Acknowledgements.
So, you're an illiterate t/r/o/l/l and a snowflake.
T/r/o/l/l/s, in an effort to not look s/t/u/p/i/d, used to read the things they were criticizing.
This abstract's use of the term "high culture" makes it sound like the paper will offer a criticism of performative allyship.
I'll find out when the actual article comes out.
I miss the good old days.
Hey di/p/sh/it, we read the abstract and know exactly what we're getting: another woke white woman who goes out of her way to find "evidence" that anti ra/ci/st activists are actually ra/ci/st. But definitely not the author, as she is The One True AllyTM.
It's bo/ri/ng bu/ll/sh/it and it's doing the exacting same thing that she's "critiquing."
Lol sh/ut the f/u/c/k up you co/ck s/u/c/k/e/r. That's literally what this article is going to be. You know how in EBS book he points out the anti ra/ci/st white people and then explains how they're actually super ra/ci/st? It's going to be the same thing here, except by some white b/i/t/c/h who will claim she doesn't count as one of the anti ra/ci/st snow bunnies.
You sound like even du/mb/er than the du/mb white b/i/t/c/h who wrote the paper in the OP.
This is one of the g/a/y/e/s/t things I've ever read on this