• 9 months - 128 posts - Latest - RSS
• OP: 0 Goods vs 0 No Goods
• Thread: 128 Goods vs 81 No Goods

1. Sociologist
   978e
   

   Nope, they don't discuss this how the sample is collected and how difference in samples would produce different results.
   If you can't respond to my simple challenges, I'll just assume you have an ideological agenda and not a scientific one.

   What am I dodging?
   Now answer: how much of the clustering here https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/popkin/vignettes/popkin.html is attributed to the sample selection?
   let's do this.
   LOL. When you've responded to everything you've dodged, due to your retrograde neoliberal blah blah blah, ok?
   Page 3-4. And the content on page 6..
   Sounds like you are mistaking me for another person as well.
   If I have time after to grading, and you've responded to every challenge, I'll address Ochoa and Storey's unpublished work (contrast with material from top journals I just cited). Then after that we can go to Kierkegaard on OpenPsych and Piffer in a predator journal, and Carl in Quillette, and Lynn's personal blog masquerading as a journal, because that's totes where the mainstream science sociologists refuse to ignore is coming from.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

2. Sociologist
   8ca9
   

   Serious question:

   Do you believe Jonathan Pritchard is a "race realist"? You keep using that term, which I have never seen used in relevant scientific literature (which makes it seem your own agenda is ideological and has nothing to do with science). I quoted him indicating that humans can be coherently organized into separate population lineages that largely equate with popular notions of race. This is where your perspective seems to verge into postmodern denialism that science can coherently measure anything at all.
   You're literally arguing that the leading scientists in this field are incompetent at stats.

   Serious question: Do you believe that galaxies are "social constructs"?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

3. Sociologist
   8ca9
   

   Also, do you believe that grey wolf, red wolf, and coyote are socially constructed categories?
   Do you believe that humans should be taxonomically classified according to entirely different methods and standards than all other animals?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

4. Sociologist
   585a
   

   Also, do you believe that grey wolf, red wolf, and coyote are socially constructed categories?

   Yeah, probably. There's no fully accepted criteria for speciation. Scientists made those distinctions themselves.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

5. Sociologist
   d91c
   

   There are three things you get wrong: First, social construct and material reality are not opposed and can coexists. The second is about Pritchard. Other geneticists disagree with him, or show how the result you mention is actually not really clear. The third is that the data used by Pritchard there is meant to detect origin. So, it does not mean that your DNA is largely influenced by origin, but that origin can be retrieved from the DNA.

   Serious question:
   Do you believe Jonathan Pritchard is a "race realist"? You keep using that term, which I have never seen used in relevant scientific literature (which makes it seem your own agenda is ideological and has nothing to do with science). I quoted him indicating that humans can be coherently organized into separate population lineages that largely equate with popular notions of race. This is where your perspective seems to verge into postmodern denialism that science can coherently measure anything at all.
   You're literally arguing that the leading scientists in this field are incompetent at stats.
   Serious question: Do you believe that galaxies are "social constructs"?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

6. Sociologist
   c91e
   

   8ca9

   Are you dodging or just not reading? In addition to the pages of science you refused to respond to, I also explained my usage of the term race realist.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

7. Sociologist
   c330
   

   There are three things you get wrong: First, social construct and material reality are not opposed and can coexists.

   This is his big stumbling block though. He lacks even a novice level understanding of the concept he’s arguing against. Consequently most of his argument is a total non sequitur.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

8. Sociologist
   c91e
   

   There are three things you get wrong: First, social construct and material reality are not opposed and can coexists.
   This is his big stumbling block though. He lacks even a novice level understanding of the concept he�s arguing against. Consequently most of his argument is a total non sequitur.

   When they come back, they will continue to ignore the scientifically based arguments, pretend this is was the only response, and claim ad hominem.

   The problem is, their lack of understanding actually is central. I thought the galaxies question was a parody until I saw it was the same user.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

Reply