You don?t understand the soc at even a freshman level. Come up with a wittier tr00l.
Explain in your own words what "race is a social construct" means, if it is anything other than denial that humans have discernible genetic structure similar as that which allows taxonomic classification of related populations of other animals into separate subspecies and species.
Sociologists who are at sessions at ASA openly say on twitter things like that "European ancestry" and "subsaharan African ancestry" are not biologically real and cannot be measured.
I can�t speak to tweets I�ve never seen. It would not be at all surprising to find individuals writing dum/b things on twitter though.
What is clear from this thread is that you don�t understand either the soc or the stats. I don�t know the bio, but given your obtuseness with Soc and stats, I would wager a large sum that you don�t understand that either.
This person believes Twitter is representative of the discipline. They think they know what the average ASA session is like because of Twitter. They will not respond to any data contradicting them. Very similar to how they own goal on genetics and race.