• 1 year - 25 posts - Latest - RSS
• OP: 3 Goods vs 5 No Goods
• Thread: 40 Goods vs 28 No Goods

1. Sociologist
   44a7
   

   You're deliberately ignoring all information that shows how dangerous these experimental vaccines are. No vaccines have ever killed so many people in such a short time nor been associated with such high rates of injury and debilitation. Why would "talking to a doctor offline" be a substitute for actual research?

   What you are doing isn't actual research. You are trolling and sowing doubt, probably because you're ignorant and scared. There's no shame just in that -- we're ALL ignorant until we learn things.

   But consider that you're putting people's lives at risk if they listen to you. Those people who make the mistake of believing that you have any idea what you're saying and fail to get protected are suffering for your ignorance. And THAT is shameful.

   Meanwhile, actual research HAS long since debunked your claims. Today's estimates:

   Worldwide deaths from COVID-19: 4.14M
   Worldwide vac/cine doses administered: 3.79B
   Worldwide fully vac/cinated: 1.05B
   Worldwide fatalities potentially associated with COVID vac/cines: less than TWO THOUSAND

   Even empathy has its limits. Know the facts and get yourself protected.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 6 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

2. Sociologist
   24ad
   

   Oh hey, an amateur social scientist!
   Ok, gradflake.
   Oh hey, a person with (supposedly) a PhD in soc who thinks they know more than the scientific consensus about the safety of these vac/cines! Maybe the trol/l arguing that sociology phds are du/mb is right after all.

   What about sociologists who are supporting a medical @partheid willingly and knowingly? How will history remember them?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

3. Sociologist
   76f2
   

   You're deliberately ignoring all information that shows how dangerous these experimental vaccines are. No vaccines have ever killed so many people in such a short time nor been associated with such high rates of injury and debilitation. Why would "talking to a doctor offline" be a substitute for actual research?

   I'm just curious if you have any sources to back up your opinion? You made a statement on a public board for all to read. Are you unable to defend the statements you make? Or simply unwilling to have a reasoned discussion?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

4. Sociologist
   649a
   

   Anti-vaxxers have the freedom to not seek medical attention as they die from COVID. We'd all be a lot better off.
   People age 18-39 are twice as likely to die from blood clots caused by the Astrazeneca vaccine as they are to die from Covid.

   With all sincerity, I hope you d.i.e a slow, painful, gasping d.e.a.t.h from COVID. The world would definitely be a better place without you.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

5. Sociologist
   3a11
   

   Anti-vaxxers have the freedom to not seek medical attention as they die from COVID. We'd all be a lot better off.
   People age 18-39 are twice as likely to die from blood clots caused by the Astrazeneca vaccine as they are to die from Covid.

   Hey - congrats on being a stu/pid t/w/a/t who doesn't recognize other people exist. True freedom = you living in the woods off the grid and never interacting with another person again. I recommend you try it.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

Reply