The real inequalities are along different lines:
Ellis Mon/k: Turns out rac/ism isn’t that bad in the US!
-
You were fine until you got to "typical."
There are bitter blk women, just like there are bitter people of all races and genders.
Why state the obvious mistruth that the typical profile of an incellz is an obese blk woman?
Obese blk women are known for a lot of things (e.g. bringing meaningful contributions to cookouts). What they're not known for is shouuting people as an outlet for their anger about their limited romantic prospects.
^ Sociology is full of i/n/c/e/ls. The most typical profile of an i/n/c/e/l is an o/b/e/s/e, unattractive black woman. Can you think of any of those among sociology professors?
-
You were fine until you got to "typical."
There are bitter blk women, just like there are bitter people of all races and genders.
Why state the obvious mistruth that the typical profile of an incellz is an obese blk woman?
Obese blk women are known for a lot of things (e.g. bringing meaningful contributions to cookouts). What they're not known for is shouuting people as an outlet for their anger about their limited romantic prospects.
^ Sociology is full of i/n/c/e/ls. The most typical profile of an i/n/c/e/l is an o/b/e/s/e, unattractive black woman. Can you think of any of those among sociology professors?Do you understand what the word "incel" means or not?
I've seen Buggs on twitter openly describe herself as being incel. -
An incel (/ˈɪnsɛl/ IN-sel), a portmanteau of "involuntary celibate", is a member of an online subculture of people who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one.
The first online community to use the term "incel" was started in 1993 when a Canadian university student known only by her first name, Alana, created a website in order to discuss her sexual inactivity with others.[5][30][31][32] The website, titled "Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project", was used by people of all genders to share their thoughts and experiences.[5] In 1997, she started a mailing list on the topic that used the abbreviation INVCEL, later shortened to "incel", for "anybody of any gender who was lonely, had never had sex or who hadn't had a relationship in a long time".
-
The article is flawed in so many ways. First, the directionality of the association is not clear (hence, the models are not appropriate). People with higher income can take care of themselves better, they typically eat better, exercise, and some even enjoy the benefits of plastic surgery and other enhancements. So, it's not that they earn more money because they are more attractive only, but earning more money makes one more attractive. The second major flaw is their naive understanding of intersectionality theory. It is not a zero sum game with one variable being more important than others. One can't really compare the impact of race to the impact of being attractive. These intersect in major ways and basic regression models can't dissociate the two.
-
F371 is both jelly and low IQ. Even the econs love this paper.
Point 1 is addressed in the paper. Point 2 shows you didn't read the paper and don't understand intersectionality. The paper doesn't argue race is more or less important than looks. It shows the consequences of race, gender, and looks then compares those results to work just looking at race alone or gender alone. Literally intersectionality.