?
Do you consider Tibet part of China?
-
Tibet has been colonized by Han Chinese, against the wishes of Tibetans. What is there to discuss here? The CCP does not recognize the freedoms of speech, religion, association, the press (etc.) and thereby lacks moral authority, except in the eyes of those who themselves lack freedom of speech, press, conscience (etc.) i.e., a people who, in a basic way, do not and cannot have an opinion or will of their own.
-
No, not at all. There is no historic precedent for irredentism in the case of Tibet, as opposed to say Taiwan.
This is rather false. Tibet was unquestionably part of China under the Qing dynasty. At no time at all after 1720 has Tibet ever been recognized as a de jure independent state by the international community.
Whether or not Tibet should have "independence" comes down to Cold War geopolitics and the desire by the west to dominant China. There are 3 million people in Tibet, in mountainous highlands overlooking 1 billion Chinese people. The west doesn't acctually care about those 3 million people, they care about having geopolitical leverage against China. China would never simply grant independence to Tibet, because the next day there would be NATO bases there, and China would never cease to be at risk of an invasion which would be difficult to repel.
Tibetans, unlike Taiwanese, are a separate ethnic group and different culture from Han Chinese, and on those terms should be allowed to practice cultural autonomy as a nation. But that's different than the question of whether the greater good for humanity in the world generally would be served by a legally "independent" Tibet which would in reality be just a base for western operations against China. The US often seizes on the plight of ethnic minorities as pretext for carving enemy powers apart in service of its own interests.