Yes. Because white colleagues will be sure to tell the hire they were hired due to diversity and that this somehow makes them less than, regardless of how productive the hire actually ends up being.
LOL That never happened.
Do diversity hires usually know they are diversity hires?
-
SJWs no longer hire Gs of LGBT only when they are "white men." If they sucked up to them so much, they might hire but still, the odds are low.
Being Latino only is NOT enough diversity points at the moment. You need to either identify as bl@ck, or add another dimension, like being LGBT. B is probably the easiest to fake. Remember even for diversity hire there is a competition (just a different type), and being Latino doesn’t give you much advantage (but still better than Asian males. They are not considered diversity hire in the first place)
-
L: SJWs hire L so if they are feminist and deny sex is real
G: No chance especially if they are white
B: Generally male B do not put up with SJWs' nonsense and research in their areas (especially if they could stay sane for being straight and not a feminist)
T:You just get hired by SJWs (who are afraid to be called t r and p h o b ic)...Being Latino only is NOT enough diversity points at the moment. You need to either identify as bl@ck, or add another dimension, like being LGBT. B is probably the easiest to fake. Remember even for diversity hire there is a competition (just a different type), and being Latino doesn’t give you much advantage (but still better than Asian males. They are not considered diversity hire in the first place)
-
L: SJWs hire L so if they are feminist and deny sex is real
G: No chance especially if they are white
B: Generally male B do not put up with SJWs' nonsense and research in their areas (especially if they could stay sane for being straight and not a feminist)
T:You just get hired by SJWs (who are afraid to be called t r and p h o b ic)...Being Latino only is NOT enough diversity points at the moment. You need to either identify as bl@ck, or add another dimension, like being LGBT. B is probably the easiest to fake. Remember even for diversity hire there is a competition (just a different type), and being Latino doesn�t give you much advantage (but still better than Asian males. They are not considered diversity hire in the first place)
Spot on
-
Not the one in my department. Despite having no chance to have ever gotten that job had she been white, she acts as if she is the best, most deserving, & hardest working, and whines constantly about her victimization and demands we listen but also chides us for asking her to teach us.
It would be comical if she wasn't so convinced of her superiority.Is it possible to share her name?
-
The problem is it is almost always those who would have never gotten the job if not for diversity points who are most likely to make frequent specious claims of mistreatment or considering mistreatment we all experience as humans as due to "race/ethnicity." The majority of professors of color are excellent colleagues, smart, hard-working and deserve their jobs as much as any of us do, in my experience.
It is a tiny, albeit vocal, minority who would have not sniffed the job if not for the fact they are black are constantly whining about how they are oppressed, mistreated, evaluated unfairly, and they are utterly oblivious to the way they are not asked to meet the same standards as everyone else.
-
The problem is it is almost always those who would have never gotten the job if not for diversity points who are most likely to make frequent specious claims of mistreatment or considering mistreatment we all experience as humans as due to "race/ethnicity." The majority of professors of color are excellent colleagues, smart, hard-working and deserve their jobs as much as any of us do, in my experience.
It is a tiny, albeit vocal, minority who would have not sniffed the job if not for the fact they are blk are constantly whining about how they are oppressed, mistreated, evaluated unfairly, and they are utterly oblivious to the way they are not asked to meet the same standards as everyone else.It’s hardly limited to blks. Grie/vance-mongering narcis/sists come in all colors.
-
The problem is it is almost always those who would have never gotten the job if not for diversity points who are most likely to make frequent specious claims of mistreatment or considering mistreatment we all experience as humans as due to "race/ethnicity." The majority of professors of color are excellent colleagues, smart, hard-working and deserve their jobs as much as any of us do, in my experience.
It is a tiny, albeit vocal, minority who would have not sniffed the job if not for the fact they are black are constantly whining about how they are oppressed, mistreated, evaluated unfairly, and they are utterly oblivious to the way they are not asked to meet the same standards as everyone else.Poetry.
-
Not the one in my department. Despite having no chance to have ever gotten that job had she been white, she acts as if she is the best, most deserving, & hardest working, and whines constantly about her victimization and demands we listen but also chides us for asking her to teach us.
It would be comical if she wasn't so convinced of her superiority.
Is it possible to share her name?carla shedd