#1 One commentator mentioned PNC posting on sjmr about HD. I do not know if this is true.
#2 We know the twitter fallout between Tressie and PNC because PNC shared a smjr post about Tressie on twitter.
#3 He wrote a childish letter to the editors of AJS about AG’s AJS article to be published at the AJS. Sane AJS reviewers talked him down and rejected his childish letter.
Why is he always finding himself in these situations with women initiated only by his own decisions?
He also publicly celebrated the killing of Ashli Babbitt, basically indicating that he'll use partisan politics or any other pretext as an excuse to celebrate violence against women.
PNC was the one writing the posts about Tressie on SJMR and then reposting them on twitter feigning outrage, and Tressie knows about this.
I find all this interesting because both Tressie and PNC are over compensated and over privileged scholars who spend more time on Twitter or writing letters to editors than actually contributing to science.
Does anyone know if PNC got involved with the Pickett/Stewart thing?
#1 One commentator mentioned PNC posting on sjmr about HD. I do not know if this is true.
#2 We know the twitter fallout between Tressie and PNC because PNC shared a smjr post about Tressie on twitter.
#3 He wrote a childish letter to the editors of AJS about AG�s AJS article to be published at the AJS. Sane AJS reviewers talked him down and rejected his childish letter.
Why is he always finding himself in these situations with women initiated only by his own decisions?
He was right about AG’s fa/ke survey though. Nothing wrong with that letter.
He was right about AG�s fa/ke survey though. Nothing wrong with that letter.
Asking for the retraction of AG's ASR article just over the survey about whom no one complained show how t-r-r-i-b-l-e of a human he is. ASR reviewers put him into his place. Such a cheap behavior. He never met AG, he is never neg@tively impacted by AG, and he is 0bsessed about ru-i-ning her career is what we@k-men do.
He was right about AG?s fa/ke survey though. Nothing wrong with that letter.
Asking for the retraction of AG's ASR article just over the survey about whom no one complained show how t-r-r-i-b-l-e of a human he is. ASR reviewers put him into his place. Such a cheap behavior. He never met AG, he is never neg@tively impacted by AG, and he is 0bsessed about ru-i-ning her career is what we@k-men do.
This is sil/ly. Critiquing each other’s research is part of the scientific process.
This is sil/ly. Critiquing each other�s research is part of the scientific process.
You need to know that 1) using your energy to retract an already published article over no evidence, 2) wasting your peers' months of work on an article by trying to get it retracted despite the peer-review process' conclusion is a waste of energy and time of your scientist peers. This my friend, is not critiquing or a part of the scientific process. This is literally trying to negatively impact your colleague rather than engage in a dialogue over substance.
This is sil/ly. Critiquing each other?s research is part of the scientific process.
You need to know that 1) using your energy to retract an already published article over no evidence, 2) wasting your peers' months of work on an article by trying to get it retracted despite the peer-review process' conclusion is a waste of energy and time of your scientist peers. This my friend, is not critiquing or a part of the scientific process. This is literally trying to negatively impact your colleague rather than engage in a dialogue over substance.
Usually the person reporting survey data is responsible for providing evidence that a survey was ever conducted. But I guess AG and Lacour and Eric Stewart are rewriting those rules!
As I said, you cannot redefine the scientific community by comparing AG with Eric Stewart. Eric Steward probably really faked data. However, as Jesse Singal of the CUT noted here and did research, AG could have been shoddy but did not "create" data or commit anything unethical. PNC cannot even write something as balanced and objective as the piece by Jesse Signal, a journalist.
Usually the person reporting survey data is responsible for providing evidence that a survey was ever conducted. But I guess AG and Lacour and Eric Stewart are rewriting those rules!
As I said, you cannot redefine the scientific community by comparing AG with Eric Stewart. Eric Steward probably really faked data. However, as Jesse Singal of the CUT noted here and did research, AG could have been shoddy but did not "create" data or commit anything unethical. PNC cannot even write something as balanced and objective as the piece by Jesse Signal, a journalist.
Usually the person reporting survey data is responsible for providing evidence that a survey was ever conducted. But I guess AG and Lacour and Eric Stewart are rewriting those rules!
You seem uninformed on AG’s fra/ud. Singal showed only that she knew some ghet/to-dwellers. He was unable to verify any of the serious allegations.
PNC hates women. He has been outed as the HD tr00l, the Tressie tr00l and the Kaitlin Boyle tr00l, and went after AG with a relentless vindictiveness that was disturbing. He is an unhappy man and clearly something is wrong in his life
He’s a PoS, but you’re no better than he is, flinging unsubstantiated accusations. You’re worse.
Regardless he behaves in a way that makes academia t0xic place. Why is it always PNC going after others? I wonder how he is in his department and whether he will finally be cancelled for good and we no longer have to listen to his antics against other professors
I'm no PNC fan, but he made his name attacking Wilcox and Regnerus. Learn your history, kids.
No disagreement from me on this.
Regardless he behaves in a way that makes academia t0xic place. Why is it always PNC going after others? I wonder how he is in his department and whether he will finally be cancelled for good and we no longer have to listen to his antics against other professors
I'm no PNC fan, but he made his name attacking Wilcox and Regnerus. Learn your history, kids.
#1 One commentator mentioned PNC posting on sjmr about HD. I do not know if this is true.
#2 We know the twitter fallout between Tressie and PNC because PNC shared a smjr post about Tressie on twitter.
#3 He wrote a childish letter to the editors of AJS about AG�s AJS article to be published at the AJS. Sane AJS reviewers talked him down and rejected his childish letter.
Why is he always finding himself in these situations with women initiated only by his own decisions?
1. false. the only one posting about that is you.
2. pnc didn't have a fall out with tmc, she threw a hizzy fit and he apologized profusely as to not attract the full force of blk twitter ire.
3. pnc was cleary onto something. and it was asr not ajs.