And who could forget this gem from the new York times piece.
'Mr. Desmond said that the results �kind of blew us away; we weren�t expecting to see such a big effect and an effect to last so long.�'
Funny, that's exactly what the Thai street girl said to me during my last trip to Bangkok.
And who could forget this gem from the new York times piece.
'Mr. Desmond said that the results ?kind of blew us away; we weren?t expecting to see such a big effect and an effect to last so long.?'
Funny, that's exactly what the Thai street girl said to me during my last trip to Bangkok.
Sad that you have to pay for it.
And who could forget this gem from the new York times piece.
'Mr. Desmond said that the results ?kind of blew us away; we weren?t expecting to see such a big effect and an effect to last so long.?'
Funny, that's exactly what the Thai street girl said to me during my last trip to Bangkok.
Sad that you have to pay for it.
Don't have to; am able to.
Yeah, but not all things that fail to replicate are p-hacks. Lots of things are different if you use different variables, samples, etc. This was probably p-hacking, but most work that is wrong like this is honestly wrong rather than p-hacking.
So no, I don't think retraction was the right call. You can't retract a paper because it might have been p-hacking, even though I think it was.
These guys p hacked to find what they wanted. The paper should have been retracted by the ASR editor -- but, you know, he published in his own journal. So ethics are not there.
Any substantive critique of the paper is getting deleted, mods are for some reason trying to end discussion of what went on here
There are auto-deletion bots set up that delete a random assortment of slightly charged words, ostensibly to limit flame wars. You can usually get around this by misspelling words like "fayl".
https://twitter.com/kjhealy/status/1223063518729113600?s=19
You were saying?
Two days in and still none of the Twitterati dare to link to the critique? Cowards.
Why did he delete the tweet?
You can find it in the Wayback Machine. I posted a link but got b o t d e l e t e d