Yes, I do make fun of those thoughts, because they are ridiculous! As ridiculous as pizzagate. The fact that POC have those thoughts doesn�t make them less ridiculous, and POC are not immune to have their ridiculous thoughts laughed at.
It only seems ridiculous to you because you have never participated in any collective memory of harmful medical experimentation or germ warfare happening to your group under guise of beneficial medical care or human aid. Your inherent sense of trust toward authority is caused by your social privilege -- you feel like the economic/state power structure has always been on "your side" and the idea that it would act to harm you seems impossible or absurd to you. Others feel differently because of how that system affected them in the past.
Lord Jeffrey Amhert engaged in biological warfare against Indians by distributing to them smallpox-infected blankets.
I don't remember what the specific objections to the Pizzagate theory were or why it was considered "ridiculous," can you remind me? ObviouslyDemocrats participating in child
trafficking is really old news now and well-documented seeing as we know about Epstein's island. Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Bill Richardson were all Epstein frequent fliers. Clinton, Gates, Prince Andrew have not really gotten in trouble, and we can see in the US that Gates and Clinton have barely faced controversy at all for their participation in Epstein's crimes, mostly thanks to a friendly media. So the idea that powerful politicians participate in child trafficking on a mysterious billionaire's hidden island is not absurd and considered credible, but the idea that the same thing would happen at a business establishment in Washington, D.C. somehow is? What is the difference?