Which are the sections that are making quick decisions? Mine still says "unassigned."..... Am I the only one?
ASA acceptance
-
Which are the sections that are making quick decisions? Mine still says "unassigned."..... Am I the only one?
Not the only one; mine's still queued for my first choice and says Unassigned. Frustrating, since there will be no room/time left for a second-choice or second-alternate reviewer to consider it if/when this organizer ever moves it along.
-
Not the only one; mine's still queued for my first choice and says Unassigned. Frustrating, since there will be no room/time left for a second-choice or second-alternate reviewer to consider it if/when this organizer ever moves it along.
Happened to me last years. By the time the organizer of my first choice session got around to rejecting me, both my other choices were set and I was moved straight to the roundtables.
-
Not the only one; mine's still queued for my first choice and says Unassigned. Frustrating, since there will be no room/time left for a second-choice or second-alternate reviewer to consider it if/when this organizer ever moves it along.
Happened to me last years. By the time the organizer of my first choice session got around to rejecting me, both my other choices were set and I was moved straight to the roundtables.So, does anyone ever contact the session organizer who has their paper to ask about the status of their paper, or is that just going to irritate them?
-
Not the only one; mine's still queued for my first choice and says Unassigned. Frustrating, since there will be no room/time left for a second-choice or second-alternate reviewer to consider it if/when this organizer ever moves it along.
Happened to me last years. By the time the organizer of my first choice session got around to rejecting me, both my other choices were set and I was moved straight to the roundtables.Yup. Second choices almost never come to fruition because organizers are all making choices at the same time. So unless you get a reject very early the best you can hope for is roundtable.
I've had papers lost three times this way over the years. Then my network got bigger and I only submit to sessions organized by people I know, which means they'll either accept or forward me on quickly.
-
Round tables don't have a limit on number of papers ( I've organized twice). So a reject means you don't fit with the section,my our submission got lost, or you submitted something so bad the organizer can't bright themselves to add you.
Not true there is unlimited space, particularly depending on where ASA is located (if more or less people go) and which section (those that get many papers vs few). I had a paper that was rejected by roundtables but in the same form, accepted by an ASA journal for publication
-
papers do get rejected from roundtables. only so many papers can be accepted for each roundtable session do to space constraints. If the paper says rejected then it has been rejected completely. If it says unassigned, complete, pending then it is waiting to be reviewed. If it says accepted then it is accepted for a session. Ever think that maybe the one person in meeting services was out for the day? Chill out! If you are so concerned about your paper contact the session organizer (that's what they are there for). The software is fantastic so don't comment on something you don't understand. There is much more than just "reviewing papers" that the software does.
-
papers do get rejected from roundtables. only so many papers can be accepted for each roundtable session do to space constraints. If the paper says rejected then it has been rejected completely. If it says unassigned, complete, pending then it is waiting to be reviewed. If it says accepted then it is accepted for a session. Ever think that maybe the one person in meeting services was out for the day? Chill out! If you are so concerned about your paper contact the session organizer (that's what they are there for). The software is fantastic so don't comment on something you don't understand. There is much more than just "reviewing papers" that the software does.
ooooh the ASA apologists are back out in force today. the software is NOT fantastic. stop it.