yeah lol
Anyone ever heard a blek say its not my job 2 educate u @ a conference?
-
Particularly at a conference where people, presumably, come to learn new things from people who do supposedly cutting edge research about those things, most of whom are, purportedly, educators.
Or maybe I'm missing something.I think there's a difference between educating a person about the research conducted and educating a person about basic human decency.
-
No. That�s normally something said in regards to popular discourse. I can�t see how it would even come up at a conference.
Methinks we have undergrads who think they can get away with pretending they�re in tbt academy by reading Twitter.No this actually happened at a conference about 3-4 years ago. I was sitting in on a panel and some woman said all the presentations were r/a/c/i/s/t. Some older white guy asked in what way and she said it's not her job to educate him. She continued on calling the panels papers r/a/c/i/s/t.
This is the state of our field and it's only going to get worse.
-
No. That?s normally something said in regards to popular discourse. I can?t see how it would even come up at a conference.
Methinks we have undergrads who think they can get away with pretending they?re in tbt academy by reading Twitter.
No this actually happened at a conference about 3-4 years ago. I was sitting in on a panel and some woman said all the presentations were r/a/c/i/s/t. Some older white guy asked in what way and she said it's not her job to educate him. She continued on calling the panels papers r/a/c/i/s/t.
This is the state of our field and it's only going to get worse.Yeah. And I've been in a conference and said, "It is important to try to find a way to speak to a wide range of students" and had some older white guy lose it accusing me of wanting to coddle blacks, and becoming even angrier when I ignored his accusation. I guess in his mind reaching people is coddling them, and POC can't be concerned about anyone but other POC--not poor whites, not differently-abled people, not anyone but POC.
S t u p i d people come in all shades and ages. Just step around them and move on. It wasn't my job to teach that old white man how s t u p i d he was.
-
Black women in sociology are basically just a bad joke that everyone laughs at, inside and outside the discipline. They understand their own material in such a degraded and subliterate way that they are unable to explain it outside a classroom setting in which they are 'always cor/rect' in the face of a captive audience who are forced to agree in order to pass the class. Put any of them in a debate in the real world even with an undergrad in another discipline and they would get intellectually slaughtered.
-
Black women collectively amount to the special ed class in sociology, and really in academia overall). They have no standard requirements for scholarship or behavior compared to their colleagues of any other race/gender combination, they perform less work than any of their colleagues and even COMPLAIN when they are asked to do a comparable amount of work. Regarding behavior, they definitely act more like r/e/t/a/r/d/e/d children than like intelligent adults, if you've observed them on twitter. Affirmative action means black women are perpetually held at lower standard of work ethic and quality than anyone else -- that determines not only admissions and hiring, but increasingly black women are demanding the same low standards for citations and tenure. My friends, that is how civilizations collapse. The funniest thing is how proud and loud black women are about doing less and worse work than any of their colleagues. We get it, your IQ scores are lower than anyone else's, you aren't capable of doing the same work as your peers, but why do you feel so proud about flaunting that?
-
They�re uppity and don�t care to work.
They aren't "uppity" because they have no sense of pride in their work. Look up the definitions of the word "uppity." It doesn't apply, and you're just trying to invoke old race cliches. Black women in academia today are the opposite of uppity in that they are openly boastful about doing *less and worse work* than their colleagues. They don't view themselves as superior at all, and seem very content to play sassy mammy mascot roles for corporate identity liberalism.
-
They?re uppity and don?t care to work.
They aren't "uppity" because they have no sense of pride in their work. Look up the definitions of the word "uppity." It doesn't apply, and you're just trying to invoke old race cliches. Black women in academia today are the opposite of uppity in that they are openly boastful about doing *less and worse work* than their colleagues. They don't view themselves as superior at all, and seem very content to play sassy mammy mascot roles for corporate identity liberalism.They’re certainly uppity, and also have never evolved or adaptedto American culture. They’ve yet to learn a first language.
-
This site is a magnet for betas.
Someone said something you didn't like, so you complain on an annonymous form.
Those blek women state and defend their beliefs in public.
Instead of complaining about them, you should find one of them and ask them to teach you how to have some balz.
-
This site is a magnet for betas.
Someone said something you didn't like, so you complain on an annonymous form.
Those blek women state and defend their beliefs in public.
Instead of complaining about them, you should find one of them and ask them to teach you how to have some balz.Yeah and so do Alex Jones InfoWars people. The difference here is disagreeing with "all white people are g/e/n/o/c/i/d/a/l r/a/c/i/s/t/s who have daily fantasies of m/u/r/d/e/r/i/n/g minorities" will get you labeled a r/a/c/i/s/t, canceled, and probably fired in the field of sociology and most of academia. Disagreeing with "they're using chemicals to make frogs g/a/y" won't give you that outcome.
-
Anyway I'm guessing the point of this thread is to highlight how i/n/s/a/n/e/l/y s/t/u/p/i/d that an educator at an academic conference saying that is.
It's one thing if it's a rando on twitter. It's completely different if it's another academic at a f/u/c/k/i/n/g academic conference.
-
People around the world are going to jail and getting killed for expressing their beliefs.
And consevatives in Western countries go "People won't let me say what I want to say! Wahh, wahh, wahh."
The cowardice is sickening.
Yeah and so do Alex Jones InfoWars people. The difference here is disagreeing with "all white people are g/e/n/o/c/i/d/a/l r/a/c/i/s/t/s who have daily fantasies of m/u/r/d/e/r/i/n/g minorities" will get you labeled a r/a/c/i/s/t, canceled, and probably fired in the field of sociology and most of academia. Disagreeing with "they're using chemicals to make frogs g/a/y" won't give you that outcome.
This site is a magnet for betas.
Someone said something you didn't like, so you complain on an annonymous form.
Those blek women state and defend their beliefs in public.
Instead of complaining about them, you should find one of them and ask them to teach you how to have some balz.
Yeah and so do Alex Jones InfoWars people. The difference here is disagreeing with "all white people are g/e/n/o/c/i/d/a/l r/a/c/i/s/t/s who have daily fantasies of m/u/r/d/e/r/i/n/g minorities" will get you labeled a r/a/c/i/s/t, canceled, and probably fired in the field of sociology and most of academia. Disagreeing with "they're using chemicals to make frogs g/a/y" won't give you that outcome. -
No. That?s normally something said in regards to popular discourse. I can?t see how it would even come up at a conference.
Methinks we have undergrads who think they can get away with pretending they?re in tbt academy by reading Twitter.
No this actually happened at a conference about 3-4 years ago. I was sitting in on a panel and some woman said all the presentations were r/a/c/i/s/t. Some older white guy asked in what way and she said it's not her job to educate him. She continued on calling the panels papers r/a/c/i/s/t.
This is the state of our field and it's only going to get worse.Name and shame if you’re serious.