• 10 months - 33 posts - Latest - RSS
• OP: 27 Goods vs 14 No Goods
• Thread: 178 Goods vs 140 No Goods

1. Sociologist
   fde3
   

   Wait, I thought we were talking about Amy Chua, and now you're describing Alice Goffman.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !

2. Sociologist
   de53
   

   Without accepting her conclusions, I think her notion of *market dominant minorities* is valid as a sociological concept.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 7 GOOD 4 NO GOOD !

3. Sociologist
   8f2d
   

   Stone racist. I mean if she were white we would call her a racist

   10 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

4. Sociologist
   53bf
   

   everything amy has ever written has to be cleaned up by social scientists bc she simply doesn't know wtf she's talking about

   Isn't that still major success for a law professor?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

5. Sociologist
   efcb
   

   In my encounters with Chua it's been clear to me that she's incredibly shallow and has a very hollywood mover-shaker approach to legal scholarship. She's very very well connected, but she's also a lapdog for juris prudence elites. It's just weird and I don't care for her at all.

   She's 100% racist and definitely favors white students over everyone and anyone else, including asians. She only likes "a certain type" of asian student.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !

6. Sociologist
   272c
   

   She is an antisemite. She pointed out that Russia's Oligarch's were mostly jewish, which was both dangerous, and not a coincidence.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !

7. Sociologist
   272c
   

   What type, efcb? I don't like her either. She spreads antisemitism and then says she is married to a jew, like that matters.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !

8. Sociologist
   de53
   

   Is it inaccurate to point out that Russia's billionaire oligarchs are mostly Jewish?
   Isn't it kind of like pointing out that most Fortune 500 CEO's are white men?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 5 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

9. Sociologist
   8de6
   

   She can’t be racist, because racism is an expression of power. Only those who hold power are racist, thus a cis female minority as her cannot be racist. Maybe her husband is the racist one, and he’s using (abusing!) her as a channel for his racism.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !

10. Sociologist
    d98f
    

    She is currently experiencing a nervous breakdown. I might not agree with her views but I think that her reputation has been ruined for no good reason over some silly comment that some insecure grad student misunderstood. I read some of her book and she talks about upholding her family's honor over the generations.

    9 months ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

11. Sociologist
    fde3
    

    Tiger Moms don't get nervous breakdowns, just like Tiger Cubs don't get sexually harassed.

    9 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

12. Sociologist
    1d49
    

    she's hot

    9 months ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 3 NO GOOD !

13. Sociologist
    b38a
    

    "She can’t be racist, because racism is an expression of power. Only those who hold power are racist, thus a cis female minority as her cannot be racist. Maybe her husband is the racist one, and he’s using (abusing!) her as a channel for his racism."

    Seems legit
    - sociologist of race

    9 months ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

Reply